Skip to main content

Is there BS behind the Puma chipset latency story?

I frequently read about how Puma-based DOCSIS modems have severe latency problems.  Back in 2016, a user on DSL Reports who states that he is an "EE" that "designs electronics" did an analysis and claimed that he found very frequent and repeatable ~250 ms latency spikes due to his modem's Puma chipset.  (It is important to note that this person did not claim to have any professional or academic credentials in networking.)

The data he published - a repeatable and consistent 250 ms latency - seems so bizarre that I found it almost impossible to fathom that his findings were typical behavior, or that ISPs would certify such poorly behaving modems. Later in 2016, an article was published that amplified his claims and his story took off as "the experience of everyone with a Puma-based modem".

By April 2017, another article was published in The Register stating that someone was pursuing a class action lawsuit against Arris related to Puma-based modems. [The way I read it, Arris won the essentials of the lawsuit.]

By August 2018, The Register reported that a fix was released, but the documents cited by the "bug fix" article don't appear to mention a latency issue, but instead a DoS vulnerability. It is unclear how the article's author concluded that the released bug fix was associated with the Puma latency claim.

Now, years later, the "Puma latency claim" is still paraded around as a truth.  But is it true? Has anyone taken the time to validate the claim?

I can't repeat it.

"Trust, but verify" is an often repeated proverb.  Sadly, many people trust, and many fewer verify.

Since I have a bunch of modems under my control that are Puma-based, specifically Arris SB6190s, I decided to instrument them.  I performed a latency test for months on active Internet connections to remote servers through these Puma-based modems.

My Puma modem shows very low latency, wildly different than the 2016 claim

I didn't find any latency issues that look anything even remotely close to resembling the claims of the original forum post. Instead, I see very consistent pings between 10 and 23 ms, with an average around 11.5 ms.  And this is over an actively used Internet connection from my home LAN client to my ISP's remote infrastructure.

Conclusion: Puma is good.

Although the original claim states that Puma chipset latency and loss problems are extraordinarily evident, my deep analysis shows.... nothing. Since I cannot repeat any of the findings of the original forum poster's claim, I must conclude that the Puma issue does not exist.  Perhaps the original claimant's results were due to infrastructure issues at his ISP, data collection issues, a client issue, a specific hardware failure, a DoS, a saturated network connection, or something else.  But whatever it was, after deep analysis into the claim, it cannot be repeated on any of my Puma configurations of today.

So instead of the original claim, I have a updated claim: Puma: impressively low latency performance.


Popular posts from this blog

Fixing a SodaStream Jet, part 1: Disassembly Guide

I've had my SodaStream Jet for years, and once in a while something has gone wrong. Disassembly is the first step to repair.  Start with this article to see how to disassemble the SodaStream, and then once you have that down, scroll through my other articles to see how I repaired specfic SodaStream problems. SodaStream Jet Disassembly Guide Tools Required Flat head screwdriver Phillips head screwdriver 1. Remove the Carbonator.  Duh. 2. Remove the black panel lever The front big black tilt lever needs to be removed first. Removing this panel is tricky, but it isn't impossible. Looking up at the bottom of the black panel, there are two tabs, one on the left and one on the right. These tabs fully secure the panel in place. The trick is to use a flat-head screwdriver under the plastic to gently lever the tabs out of the way.  Note in the pictures how I approach these tabs with my screwdriver.  I usually release the left side first, and then I release ...

Fixing my Wahl 9918 Groomsman Beard and Mustache Trimmer

Not everyone would bother repairing a $25 beard trimmer, but why not fix something for under $5 instead of spending another $25? My  Wahl 9918 Groomsman Beard and Mustache Trimmer  has admirably performed its beauty duty for many years, but the time came when the battery just wasn't holding a charge any more.  Most people would just put the trimmer in the trash and buy a new one, but I figured I could repair my otherwise excellent Wahl and save some money. In fact, even high priced trimmer and rotary shaver brands, like Norelco and Remington, can be easily repaired using a process similar to the one I used to fix my Wahl.  Read on to find out how. I opened up the Wahl by popping off the black plastic faceplate with a tiny flathead screwdriver, which revealed two screws.  By removing the two screws I was able to easily open up the unit, revealing the guts of the device. Backplate off, Revealing the screws The internals are rather simple: a motor, a...

Fixing a SodaStream Jet, Repair #2 - Broken Fill Button

My Soda Stream Jet's fill button broke, which means I can not longer carbonate water by pressing the pushbutton. This caused all sorts of grief in my household. Here is how I managed to repair my Jet to give it another 10 years of life (hopefully). First, a look at the button The fill button on the top of the SodaStream is actually a simple lever. Pressing down on the button moves a pin that does the actual work of pressing open the Carbonator's valve. Unfortunately, the axis point is fairly thin and can see a lot of stress. That's where my Soda Stream button cracked. [ I think the usage tip here is "don't over-press the button like a gorilla, it doesn't do anything but put high stress on the button."] Cracked levering point of the button The Pesky Lever Retaining Pin The Fix It was pretty easy for me to replace the button: Take off the back of the Soda Stream and remove the carbonator. Push out the the button lever's steel retaining pin. This takes qu...

Trendnet TEW-652BRP and DD-WRT Success!

I recently visited my dad while on a business trip when I coincidentally discovered that DD-WRT is now available for his TEW-652. The TEW-652BRP has been a great router for my father, but it isn't what I'd call "feature rich". An upgrade to DD-WRT is a big bonus. I live 2500 miles away from my non-technical father, and so a well-specified router that helps me manage his network remotely is important to both of us. This article will explain what I did to finally get DD-WRT working on my TEW-652BRP v1.0R. About the TEW-652brp It's a nice looking little black 802.11n, 2.5 GHz router. It was amazingly inexpensive (usually way under $30), and  the TEW-652brp is available through Amazon. Mine is a version 1.0R, you'll likely want the same version. Out of the box, it works quite well - it has been stable, and I was fairly happy with the stock firmware. But it was short on features - I like having VPN, SSH, and flexible DHCP services on the home netwo...

Sodastream Carbonator Leakage, Usage, and Weight

SodaStream 60L "Carbonator" CO2 cylinders have a specific weight when empty, plus about 410 or so grams for the CO2 they should have when they're "full".  A little while ago I went to buy a replacement Carbonator from my local hardware store. The dealer pulled a new Carbonator out of the box and sensed it was lighter than usual.  He put the "light" Carbonator in the "empty" pile and sold me a different one.  At that moment I concluded that it would be smart of me to weigh both new and empty SodaStream carbonators.  Here are the results. Weighing a SodaStream Carbonator - for both Science and Consumer Protection.       The dealer told me that sometimes the carbonators leak after they leave the SodaStream filling facility.  That means there could be an opportunity for customers like me to get ripped off! The SodaStream cylinders I buy claim to have a net product weight of 410 grams - and that means that a full Soda Stream Carbonator shou...

Fix a Lightning Cable with Heat Shrink Tubing

We've all seen a Lightning cable that has started to fall apart.  They get used every day, and after enough tugs and yanks on your iPhone, they start to fray. I've seen a lot of these frayed cables, so I've started to fix them before they break with heat shrink tube.  I get my heat shrink on Amazon, like this handy and inexpensive pack.   I prefer the heat shrink tubes without internal glue - it has higher flexibility and a smaller outside diameter once shrunk. Heat Shrink Tubing on an Old, Frayed Lightning Cable In the photo here, you'll see that I slid on a 1.25 inch length of heat shrink over the lighting connector, and then shrunk it into place.  I chose a diameter that just barely fits over the lightning connector.  In all, it took about 60 seconds to perform this repair. Warning: the white plastic of the lightning cable has a pretty low melting point.  It seems to start to melt at about 125°C (or about 250°F), which is the same temperatur...

Other Posts

Show more